| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Fullarton Computer Industries Ltd v Central Arbitration Committee ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Fullarton Computer Industries Ltd v Central Arbitration Committee
''Fullarton Computer Industries Ltd v Central Arbitration Committee'' () (Scot CS 168 ) is an UK labour law case, concerning collective bargaining.
==Facts==
Fullarton was challenging a Central Arbitration Committee decision for recognition of the Iron and Steel Trades Confederation. Fullarton had announced redundancies in October and November 2000 after an application from the ISTC for recognition. In December 2000 the ISTC applied to the Central Arbitration Committee for recognition in respect of a bargaining unit under Schedule A1 paragraph 22. CAC made a panel with a case manager, but no agreement was reached by February 2001 so the CAC decided the bargaining unit was at the relevant plant as the union proposed. Comparing the manager and the union lists, the case manager decided 49.3% of people at work were union members. The union requested reconsideration, and then it was 51.3%, so the CAC decided a ballot would not be held. Fullarton argued the case manager’s decision was ''ultra vires'', because the CAC ought to take the decision, that it was unfair anyway because 15 new members were found and Fullarton had no way of seeing how the conclusion was reached, that even then the decision was irrational because paragraph 22(4) conditions were not given proper weight, nor was the marginal nature of the decision.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Fullarton Computer Industries Ltd v Central Arbitration Committee」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|